- 相关推荐
考研英语（一）阅读真题Passage four解析
在日常学习和工作中，我们最不陌生的就是试题了，试题是命题者根据测试目标和测试事项编写出来的。那么你知道什么样的试题才能有效帮助到我们吗？下面是小编整理的考研英语（一）阅读真题Passage four解析，欢迎阅读，希望大家能够喜欢。
考研英语一阅读真题Passage four解析
36.【C】was contemptuous of McDonell’s conduct
【解析】题干在问,第一段划线部分“But it did so while holding its...”最可能表明什么?此题为句意题。前一句说,最高法院推翻了对前官员的腐败方面的定罪,划线部分后面说,该官员收受了各种贿赂,前后用But连接,是反义的关系,所以C答案正确。
37.【A】concrete returns for gift-givers
【解析】此题为细节题。题干在问,根据第四段,一个官员的行为只有在涉及到______时,才被认为是腐败的?此题可以定位到第二句话But under anti-bribery laws, proof must be made of concrete benefits, such as approval of a contract or regulation. concrete benefits与选项concrete returns构成同义替换。
38.【C】 justifying in addressing the needs of the constituents.
【解析】此题为细节题。题干在问,法庭的裁决是基于公共官员______的前提条件下的。本题定位在第五段But the ruling reinforces the need for citizens and their elected representatives, not the courts, to ensure equality of access to government.因此选C.
39.【B】guarantee fair play in official access
【解析】 此题为细节题。题干在问,在政府实施透明度高的法律是为了______? 本题定位在This type of integrity requires will-enforced laws in government transparency, such as records of official meetings, rules on lobbying, and information about each elected leader’s source of wealth. Integrity与B选项的fair同义替换。
40.【D】supportive
【解析】此题为态度题。题干在问,对于法庭的裁决,作者的态度是______?本题定位在文章最后一句,The court’s ruling is a step forward in the struggle against both corruption and official favoritism.所以答案选D.
Section II Reading Comprehension
Part A
Directions:
Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)
Text 4
Scientific papers are the recordkeepers of progress in research. Each year researchers publish millions of papers in more than 30,000 journals. The scientific community measures the quality of those papers in a number of ways, including the perceived quality of the journal (as reflected by the title’s impact factor) and the number of citations a specific paper accumulates. The careers of scientists and the reputation of their institutions depend on the number and prestige of the papers they produce, but even more so on the citations attracted by these papers.
Citation cartels, where journals, authors, and institutions conspire to inflate citation numbers, have existed for a long time. In 2016, researchers developed an algorithm to recognize suspicious citation patterns, including groups of authors that disproportionately cite one another and groups of journals that cite each other frequently to increase the impact factors of their publications. Recently, another expression of this predatory behavior has emerged: so-called support service consultancies that provide language and other editorial support to individual authors and to journals sometimes advise contributors to add a number of citations to their articles.
The advent of electronic publishing and authors’ need to find outlets for their papers resulted in thousands of new journals. The birth of predatory journals wasn’t far behind. These journals can act as milk cows where every single article in an issue may cite a specific paper or a series of papers. In some instances, there is absolutely no relationship between the content of the article and the citations. The peculiar part is that the journal that the editor is supposedly working for is not profiting at all—it is just providing citations to other journals. Such practices can lead an article to accrue more than 150 citations in the same year that it was published.
How insidious is this type of citation manipulation? In one example, an individual—acting as author, editor, and consultant—was able to use at least 15 journals as citation providers to articles published by five scientists at three universities. The problem is rampant in Scopus, a citation database, which includes a high number of the new “international” journals. In fact, a listing in Scopus seems to be a criterion to be targeted in this type of citation manipulation.
Scopus itself has all the data necessary to detect this malpractice. Red flags include a large number of citations to an article within the first year. And for authors who wish to steer clear of citation cartel activities: when an editor, a reviewer, or a support service asks you to add inappropriate references, do not oblige and do report the request to the journal.
36. According to Paragraph l, the careers of scientists can be determined by ______.
[A] how many citations their works contain
[B] how many times their papers are cited
[C] the prestige of the people they work with
[D] the status they have in scientific circles
37. The support service consultancies tend to ______.
[A] recommend journals to their clients
[B] list citation patterns for their clients
[C] ask authors to include extra citations
[D] advise contributors to cite each other
38. The function of the “milk cow” journals is to ______.
[A] boost citation counts for certain authors
[B] help scholars publish articles at low cost
[C] instruct first-time contributors in citation
[D] increase the readership of new journals
39. What can be learned about Scopus from the last two paragraphs?
[A] It fosters competition among citation providers.
[B] It has the capability to identify suspicious citations.
[C] It hinders the growth of “international” journals.
[D]It is established to prevent citation manipulation.
40. What should an author do to deal with citation manipulators?
[A] Take legal action
[B] Demand an apology
[C] Seek professional advice
[D] Reveal their misconduct
【答案】
36. [B] how many times their papers are cited
37. [C] ask authors to include extra citations
38. [A] boost citation counts for certain authors
39. [B] It has the capability to identify suspicious citations
40. [D] Reveal their misconduct
【考研英语一阅读真题Passage four解析】相关文章：
2024考研英语（一）真题：阅读Text 2题源解析09-25
2024考研英语阅读理解真题题材解析09-24
2017考研英语（一）阅读真题解析03-11
2024考研英语一完形填空真题答案解析09-24
考研英语真题：完形填空题源解析09-24
考研英语：阅读真题常见词汇09-24